Global Politics, International High Finance, Propaganda

Contributors

Showing posts with label Martin Luther King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Luther King. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

The King Family statement on the Justice Department's "Limited investigation" of the MLK Assassination.

The King Family statement on the Justice Department's "Limited investigation" of the MLK Assassination.

(This is taken from http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20070115&articleId=4480 )

Today is Martin Luther King Day, 15 January 2007.

Let us strive to achieve Martin Luther King's "Dream", a World of Justice. Let us Reverse the Tide of War.

ATLANTA ... On behalf of The family of Martin Luther King, Jr, Martin Luther King III today issued the following statement on the U.S. Justice Department's release of its report on their "limited investigation" of recent evidence regarding the assassination of Dr. King

"We learned only hours before the Justice Department press conference that they were releasing the report of their results of their "limited investigation," which covered only two areas of new evidence concerning the assassination of Dr. King. We had requested that we be given a copy of the report a few days in advance so that we might have had the opportunity to review it in detail. Since that courtesy was not extended to us, we are only able at this time to state the following:

1. We initially requested that a comprehensive investigation be conducted by a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, independent of the government, because we do not believe that, in such a politically-sensitive matter, the government is capable of investigating itself.

2. The type of independent investigation we sought was denied by the federal government. But in our view, it was carried out, in a Memphis courtroom, during a month-long trial by a jury of 12 American citizens who had no interest other than ascertaining the truth. (Kings v. Jowers)

3. After hearing and reviewing the extensive testimony and evidence, which had never before been tested under oath in a court of law, it took the Memphis jury only one (1) hour to find that a conspiracy to kill Dr. King did exist. Most significantly, this conspiracy involved agents of the governments of the City of Memphis, the state of Tennessee and the United States of America. The overwhelming weight of the evidence also indicated that James Earl Ray was not the triggerman and, in fact, was an unknowing patsy.

4. We stand by that verdict and have no doubt that the truth about this terrible event has finally been revealed.

5. We urge all interested Americans to read the transcript of the trial on the King Center website and consider the evidence, so they can form their own unbiased conclusions.

Although we cooperated fully with this limited investigation, we never really expected that the government report would be any more objective than that which has resulted from any previous official investigation. In a reasonable period of time, when we have had an opportunity to study the report, we will provide a detailed analysis of it to the media and on the aforementioned website."

For more information, please contact communications@thekingcenter.org .




And this earlier statement from Coretta Scott King, just after the original trial in 1999:

“We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience.” – King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999.




More from the King Family back in 1999, just after the trial:-


After four weeks of testimony and over 70 witnesses in a civil trial in Memphis, Tennessee, twelve jurors reached a unanimous verdict on December 8, 1999 after about an hour of deliberations that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. In a press statement held the following day in Atlanta, Mrs. Coretta Scott King welcomed the verdict, saying,

“There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr. And the civil court’s unanimous verdict has validated our belief. I wholeheartedly applaud the verdict of the jury and I feel that justice has been well served in their deliberations. This verdict is not only a great victory for my family, but also a great victory for America. It is a great victory for truth itself. It is important to know that this was a SWIFT verdict, delivered after about an hour of jury deliberation.

The jury was clearly convinced by the extensive evidence that was presented during the trial that, in addition to Mr. Jowers, the conspiracy of the Mafia, local, state and federal government agencies, were deeply involved in the assassination of my husband. The jury also affirmed overwhelming evidence that identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. I want to make it clear that my family has no interest in retribution. Instead, our sole concern has been that the full truth of the assassination has been revealed and adjudicated in a court of law… My husband once said, “The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” To-day, almost 32 years after my husband and the father of my four children was assassinated, I feel that the jury’s verdict clearly affirms this principle. With this faith, we can begin the 21st century and the new millennium with a new spirit of hope and healing.”


Full transcript of conference







[Back to Main Index]

Wednesday, 3 September 2008

Martin Luther King Killed by US Government::- Proved in a US Court Of Law

It has been proved in A US court of law that Dr Martin Luther King (Junior) was killed by the US government.

Most readers will have heard of Dr Martin Luther King. They probably know that:
  • He was very active in the Civil Rights movement in the USA in the 1960's.
  • He won the Nobel Peace Prize.
  • He was killed by a single bullet while standing on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis Tennessee.
  • The man who went to jail for that crime was called James Earl Ray.
What most readers probably won't know is that the family and friends of Dr King never believed the official story and fought for thirty years to get nearer the truth. They succeeded in proving the official government story to be false in a US court of law.
  • In 1999, ( thirty years after the assassination)
  • in a civil trial held in Memphis Tennessee (the city where Dr King was killed)
  • the family proved in a court of law that it was the US government that killed Dr Martin Luther King and
  • not the man who was put in jail for it.
The trial lasted three weeks during which
  • seventy witnesses gave evidence and yet
  • it took the jury of six white people and six black people only one hour to decide that
  • it was (part of) the US government who executed Dr King.
Anyone interested in the trial can read an extract from the transcript on the King family website at

http://www.thekingcenter.org/civil-case-king-family-versus-jowers/

or try googling

"Complete Transcript of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Assassination Conspiracy Trial"

[
[Note:- In December 2011 I (the author) discovered that the King centre had replaced the complete trial transcript with a reduced "extraction" from that transcript. (http://www.thekingcenter.org/civil-case-king-family-versus-jowers/ )

Imagine what huge repressive political forces must have been applied to make them do that. The whole transcript can still be found here on the internet archive known as the "The Wayback Machine"

Also - in an attempt to further preserve the transcript - I have copied the version stored by the "Wayback Machine" (on Nov 17, 2006) and put it here on this blog in HTML format.
Volume 1
Volume 2

(Please note that I have not been able to find enough time to transcribe the whole transcript, so only part of it is included here)
]]

The complete media blackout of the trial is not accidental. Compare the frenzied media circus that covered the trial of O.J. Simpson (a trial about a black man killing a white woman) with the cover- up of a trial about a white man accused of killing a black man - even when that black man was a Nobel Prize Winner who has had a National Holiday named after him.

In the OJ Simpson trial between 500 and 1000 journalists discussed the significance of one small glove. Yet in the King trial two judges gave evidence and not one journalist in the whole world dared to print one word that the judges had to say.

Two JUDGES (Haynes and Brown) give evidence in the murder trial of a Nobel Prize Winner but any journalist who reported that would have been as sacked for telling the truth as Andrew Gilligan (BBC journalist) was.

2008 is the 40th anniversary of Dr King's assassination. Although the media will rightly heap praise on him for his civil rights campaigning they will deliberately ignore mentioning the political activities that I (the author) think probably got him killed.

The media will not mention that by 1967, King had become the country's most prominent opponent to the Vietnam War, and a staunch critic of overall U.S. foreign policy, which he judged militaristic.

In his "Beyond Vietnam" speech delivered at New York's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 -- a year to the day before he was murdered -- King called the United States "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today."

King also protested against the causes of poverty. Speaking-out on behalf of all poor people - not just black ones - he decried the huge income gaps between rich and poor, and called for "radical changes in the structure of our society" to redistribute wealth and power.

"True compassion," King declared, "is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring."

In his last few months King developed the relationship between peace and justice (both social and economic justice) and started to merge his Civil Rights movement into a larger "Peace and Social Justice" movement. He organised a "Poor People's Campaign" and crisscrossed the country to assemble "a multiracial army of the poor" that would go to Washington and engage in nonviolent civil disobedience at the Capitol until Congress enacted a poor people's bill of rights.

King's economic bill of rights called for massive government jobs programs to rebuild America's cities.

He was going to confront a Congress that had demonstrated its "hostility to the poor" -- appropriating "military funds with alacrity and generosity," but providing "poverty funds with miserliness."

How familiar that all sounds today, 40 years later. America is still "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today." Except that now Britain openly helps them in their illegal war. And parliament can always find money for war.

Here is a very good article on this topic


The video above is William Pepper, attorney for the King family, explaining the assassination.




[Back to Main Index]